Devotd Github
NewCoding agents

jinho-von-choi/anti-samcheonpo v0.8.0 — Agent Monitoring Harness

jinho-von-choi/anti-samcheonpo is a local harness that monitors AI coding agents for repeated testing, context drift, and similar issues.

Repositoryjinho-von-choi/anti-samcheonpo ↗

jinho-von-choi/anti-samcheonpo is a local harness that monitors AI coding agents for repeated testing, context drift, and similar issues.

GitHub description: AI 코딩 에이전트의 헛짓(과잉 검증·맥락 이탈·무한 루프·허위 완료)을 감지·경고·차단하는 하네스 / A harness that catches AI coding agents wasting time and money

stars
★ 97
Forks
8
Language
Go
License
MIT
Latest release
v0.8.0
Read original source ↗View on GitHub ↗

jinho-von-choi/anti-samcheonpo is a harness that monitors the work of AI coding agents. According to the repository information, the latest release is v0.8.0. The provided information does not say what changed in this version, so the specific changes cannot be confirmed. The tool targets over-verification, deviation from the requested scope, repetition of the same failure, and false completions.

It examines execution results and the state of the working folder: at first it guides the user with the evidence and the next action, and when the same problem repeats, it blocks the run. Environment problems and cost limit overruns are not handled by modifying code; it points the user toward human intervention instead. It explains that the judgment happens on the user's own computer, with no model calls or remote transmission. It can connect to Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Antigravity CLI, Hermes, OpenClaw, and others. It is written in Go and uses the MIT license. This is an approach that deals with repetition and scope drift at the execution stage rather than improving the agent's work itself.

Therefore, the specific improvements in v0.8.0 or the scale of the change cannot be judged from this information alone. What can be confirmed is the types of problems the tool monitors, its guidance and blocking approach, and the connection targets it says it supports. The provided information contains no evidence of actual detection accuracy or effect, so it is hard to assert more about its usefulness than that it is useful.