github.devotd.
NewEvals

open-compass/opencompass 0.5.4 — LLM evaluation over 100+ datasets

OpenCompass is an Apache-2.0 licensed LLM evaluation platform that evaluates and compares models from several providers across more than 100 datasets in a single workflow, and its latest release is 0.5.4.

Repositoryopen-compass/opencompass ↗

OpenCompass is an Apache-2.0 licensed LLM evaluation platform that evaluates and compares models from several providers across more than 100 datasets in a single workflow, and its latest release is 0.5.4.

GitHub description: OpenCompass is an LLM evaluation platform, supporting a wide range of models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Qwen, GLM, DeepSeek, etc, across 100+ datasets covering knowledge, reasoning, coding, science, language, long-context, and safety.

stars
★ 7.5K
Forks
906
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0
Latest release
0.5.4
Read original source ↗View on GitHub ↗

open-compass/opencompass is an evaluation platform that compares and measures the performance of large language models (LLMs) on the same footing. Its README describes it as an all-in-one tool that supports a wide range of models and inference backends and bundles dataset and model configuration, inference, evaluation, and result summarization into one workflow. The most recent release of this repository is 0.5.4, and the provided material does not list the changes included in that version.

The core of this project is running model and dataset configuration, evaluation, and result aggregation under a common scheme. It evaluates models from several providers such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Qwen, GLM, and DeepSeek across more than 100 datasets, and the areas it covers are knowledge, reasoning, coding, science, language, long context, and safety. The implementation language is Python and the license is Apache-2.0. The repository was created on June 15, 2023 and has collected 7,530 stars, and the README states that the tool was designed to be open, reproducible, and extensible.

Still, the fact alone that the latest release is 0.5.4 does not tell you what changed in this version. Among the score items in the research record, only momentum is given, at 1.6 out of 10, while the novelty, technique, and quality items carry no values. The reliability of the evaluation results has to be judged by looking directly at the dataset composition and the execution procedure, and for now it is realistic to treat this as a tool for comparing several models under the same conditions.